Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Visual Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peled-Elhanan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Layout as punctuation of semiosis: some examples from Israeli schoolbooks

Nurit Peled-Elhanan

School of Education, Tel-Aviv University and David Yellin Teachers College, Israel, nuritpeled{at}gmail.com

This article examines the function of layout in the representation of the Palestinian—Israeli conflict in three history textbooks used in Israeli schools. The analysis elaborates on two concepts of Kress and Van Leeuwen — `ideological layout' and `punctuation of semiosis'. The author argues that layout may `punctuate' semiosis in two different senses: first, in the sense of `bringing (conventional—official) semiosis to a temporary standstill in textual form'; and, second, in the sense of `piercing a hole' in the conventional or official semiosis it presents, and thereby criticizing it. In both cases, layout creates new complex signs that either support or contradict the verbal and visual texts it presents.

This study suggests that layout analysis may help answer larger questions concerning `the transformation of social practices into discourses about social practices in specific institutional contexts' (Van Leeuwen, 1996). The discussion of the means by which these punctuations are achieved and the messages they convey is followed by reflections upon the difficulties students and teachers may have in reading such multimodal texts.

Key Words: intertextuality • layout • multimodality • punctuation of semiosis • recontextualization

Visual Communication, Vol. 8, No. 1, 91-116 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1470357208099149


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?